The first post on the contents of the Hearing Protection : Factory Records 1978-79 box set, was on 24 March 2022.  I hadn’t intended it taking this long for the series to come to its conclusion, especially as there was only ever going to be ten parts, but having covered all of FAC1 through to FAC9, I didn’t think it would be right to do anything in depth on FAC10 while Joy Division were competing in the ICA World Cup.

FAC10 is in the above picture in the front row on the left-hand side. It is, of course, the album Unknown Pleasures.

I’ve long had a copy of this album, originally released on 15 June 1979. I bought it a few months after it came out, on the back of falling very heavily for the single Transmission.  I haven’t taken good care of it.  The vinyl itself isn’t actually too bad, but the sleeve is bashed, battered and creased, and the edges have splits to the extent that the info is unreadable.  I get quite embarrassed when I look at, with the realisation that I have played loose and free with a wonderful piece of art.

I now have a second copy of Unknown Pleasures, thanks to it being part of the box set that I bought when I visited the Factory Records exhibition that was put on at the Manchester Science and Industry Museum in the latter part of 2021.  It is not a replica of the original album, instead being the reissued and remastered version of the album issued by Warner Bros in 2015.

There is an on-line debate about the merits or otherwise of this particular repress, with many at pains to point out that it is actually a remastered version of something that had originally been remastered in 2007, meaning that the 2015 version was further compressed from digital files.  This has led to accusations that the differences in sound from the original are more than minor, and that the 2015 version is cleaner, punchier and at odds with what Martin Hannett wanted to deliver.

There is no question that the version of the album that came with the box set is different.  For one, it has no clicks or pops in the way that my 1979 pressing has succumbed to.  And yes, I find I do have to play it a little louder than I do with the original pressing, which is maybe the clearest indication that the two pieces of vinyl are far from identical. The thing is, I have ears which are almost 60-years-old and which are well past their best, (thanks, somewhat ironically, as a result of my failure to use hearing protection while DJing or going to gigs), so I’m not really best placed to outline the differences, other than to say that the remastered version feels/sounds as if I’m listening to things via a CD rather than a slab of vinyl.

Unknown Pleasures has become, with the passing of time, one of the most important and influential albums ever released.  I’ll be honest and say that when I bought it, I thought it to be a bit on the ‘meh’ side, as there wasn’t really anything that grabbed me in the same way that Transmission had. My excuse is that I was 16 years of age, and my musical tastes weren’t fully developed.  I won’t waste anyone’s time arguing the merits of its contents or otherwise, other than to say that no music collection, in my opinion, is complete unless you have a copy…..but I suppose I’ve got something of a cheek to say this given I’m someone who has nothing from Elvis Presley, The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin or Pink Floyd (among many others) in his own collection.

Here’s four tracks from the remastered album, all recorded at 320 kbps which is as good as I can do for you.  None of them made it to the Joy Division ICA:-

mp3: Joy Division – Day Of The Lords (Outside, Track 2)
mp3: Joy Division – New Dawn Fades (Outside, Track 5)
mp3: Joy Division – Wilderness (Inside, Track 3)
mp3: Joy Division – She’s Lost Control (Inside, Track 1)


9 thoughts on “FAC 10 : UNKNOWN PLEASURES

  1. Bought this at the same age and with a similar initial reaction. Loved Disorder and Shadowplay , was impressed and intrigued by New Dawn Fades and Insight, found the rest a little oppressive. Obviously it’s a grower, and, decades on, it’s apparent how important Hannett was in making JD sound like nothing else around in 79.

  2. Still have my vinyl copy and it’s in pretty good nick, though I always love the clicks and pops you get with vinyl. Sadly, for convenience, I tend to go for the digital most nowadays. But thanks for sharing some of my favourite tracks!

  3. I was 16 too when I picked it up – but it wasn’t until a full year later together with Closer and I had just discovered the full new wave of music coming post punk. I still have those two, and the 12″ singles, in my possession and I have cared well for them. I still love them, maybe even more today.

  4. “bit on the ‘meh’ side” – my first reaction too, much preferring Substance
    (is it wrong to cite a Best Of/singles compilation as a favourite album?).
    But persevere I did, and yes it is special and deserves the plaudits.
    Still waiting for Closer to fully hit though … I like it, but just doesn’t fully hit the spot

  5. It doesn’t get any better than this, I was 18 when it was released, doing my A levels and was probably trying too hard to be a sullen moody teenager and it struck a chord from the first listen. It is a rarity in that I couldn’t and still can’t decide which side I prefer they are both spot on.

  6. Incredible that for a group with a relatively small back catalogue four songs like those you’ve posted didn’t make the ICA cut.

    It’s a fairly unique record, the full package from Saville’s sleeve to Hannett’s production and the four JDs ending up with an album that they didn’t like at first and took some time to get their heads around.

  7. Seems like an ‘Addams Family’ vs. ‘Munsters’ kind of thing, lol. Your album here being the former more dignified and my fave ‘Substance’ perhaps being the latter. 💀🙏

  8. “..but I suppose I’ve got something of a cheek to say this given I’m someone who has nothing from Elvis Presley, The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, Led Zeppelin or Pink Floyd (among many others) in his own collection.”

    Nice to hear that I am not alone (if you also add the Who to that list). I also agree with your assessment of Unknown Pleasures re: the somewhat loooooong time period to really love the release.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.